PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.20%
Net income growth at 50-75% of CSIQ's 95.83%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-11.73%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CSIQ at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
4394.55%
Some yoy growth while CSIQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-8.03%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CSIQ at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-20.41%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
153.24%
AR growth well above CSIQ's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-107.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with CSIQ at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-119.52%
Negative yoy AP while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
36.75%
Some yoy usage while CSIQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-89.45%
Negative yoy while CSIQ is 606.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-31.01%
Negative yoy CFO while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
28.88%
Lower CapEx growth vs. CSIQ's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above CSIQ's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.89%
Growth well above CSIQ's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
64.47%
Investing outflow well above CSIQ's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-3049.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4014.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.