PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-227.81%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CSIQ at -64.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.18%
Negative yoy D&A while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
615.99%
Deferred tax of 615.99% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-5.80%
Negative yoy SBC while CSIQ is 57.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
43.71%
Working capital change of 43.71% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-228.96%
AR is negative yoy while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-21.81%
Negative yoy inventory while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
132.85%
AP growth of 132.85% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-26.80%
Negative yoy usage while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
793.74%
Well above CSIQ's 58.51%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
47.66%
CFO growth of 47.66% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
8.55%
CapEx growth of 8.55% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
1728.56%
Acquisition growth of 1728.56% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
280.77%
Growth of 280.77% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
3204.14%
We expand invests by 3204.14% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-836.47%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.74%
Buyback growth of 91.74% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.