PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-44.84%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CSIQ at -69.06%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-7.84%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CSIQ at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.35%
Negative yoy SBC while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
94.01%
Slight usage while CSIQ is negative at -28.97%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
34.43%
AR growth of 34.43% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
167.41%
Inventory growth of 167.41% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
118.24%
AP growth of 118.24% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-206.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CSIQ at -28.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
277.23%
Some yoy increase while CSIQ is negative at -33.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
45.59%
Some CFO growth while CSIQ is negative at -47.29%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
35.26%
CapEx growth well above CSIQ's 9.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.26%
We have some outflow growth while CSIQ is negative at -63.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
35.26%
Investing outflow well above CSIQ's 8.63%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.