1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
77.71%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.07%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.69%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -35.74%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.51%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -238.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-349.44%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 23.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1492.62%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 4372.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
44.62%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-137.88%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 43.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.30%
Growth well above ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
27.63%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -145.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.63%
Negative yoy issuance while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.