PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-531.05%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.95%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-133.90%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.35%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 393.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-22.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -238.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -31.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
118.02%
Growth well above ENPH's 23.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-9.22%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 4372.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
108.20%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.25%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ENPH's 43.46%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ENPH at -27.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-3669.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.35%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -145.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.