PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.17%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
28.15%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
2977.78%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -95.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.84%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2866.31%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -238.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.79%
Growth well above ENPH's 23.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-316.68%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 4372.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
250.43%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
47.12%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 43.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-360.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -42.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.16%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-21.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -145.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-102.23%
Negative yoy issuance while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.