PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
144.23%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.55%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.25%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
65.78%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 393.24%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
69.80%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -238.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -31.38%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
66.63%
Growth well above ENPH's 23.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-300.00%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 4372.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
143.24%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.80%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ENPH's 43.46%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
69.96%
Some yoy expansion while ENPH is negative at -42.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-55.04%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ENPH at -27.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
171.29%
Growth well above ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
117.47%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -145.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.21%
Similar buyback growth to ENPH's 70.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.