PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.79%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.37%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
86.60%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -95.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
1.63%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
316.12%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.93%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -238.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
382.76%
Growth well above ENPH's 23.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-184.08%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 4372.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
391.18%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-24.69%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 43.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.16%
Some yoy expansion while ENPH is negative at -42.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-68.20%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ENPH at -27.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-228.35%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-664.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -145.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-92.91%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 70.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.