PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.72%
Net income growth at 75-90% of ENPH's 24.63%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
30.42%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-101.41%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-110.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -35.74%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-741.88%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -238.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-213.78%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 23.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
110.75%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 4372.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-68.96%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -45.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-109.07%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 43.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-413.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -42.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
81.97%
We have some liquidation growth while ENPH is negative at -27.60%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
20.51%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. ENPH's 100.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-74.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -145.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.03%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of ENPH's 70.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.