PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.92%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.62%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
389.61%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -95.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
12.25%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
174.27%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
71.27%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 393.24%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-67.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -238.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.39%
Growth well above ENPH's 23.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
55.61%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 4372.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
2691.15%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ENPH's 43.46%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
557.36%
We have some liquidation growth while ENPH is negative at -27.60%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-177.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-55.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -145.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-104.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.20%
Buyback growth below 50% of ENPH's 70.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.