PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1213.79%
Net income growth of 1213.79% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
3.56%
D&A growth of 3.56% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-398.64%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-15.50%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-106.96%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
522.30%
AR growth of 522.30% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-255.62%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-63.13%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
84.10%
Growth of 84.10% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
295.06%
Growth of 295.06% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
-79.62%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-146.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-328653.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
32.67%
Purchases growth of 32.67% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-83.63%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-266.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-108803.59%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.