PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.24%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -27.69%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
23.02%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 23.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
234.21%
Deferred tax of 234.21% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
7.24%
Less SBC growth vs. ENPH's 29.69%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-3243.32%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 142.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-63.45%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 2045.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
58.57%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -52.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-248.28%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 160.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-396.81%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 58.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1274.77%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 304.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-459.13%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 27.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -166.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
62.93%
Growth of 62.93% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
81.13%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -166.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.46%
Buyback growth of 32.46% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.