PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-101.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -32.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.34%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 15.99%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
22.99%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. ENPH's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-19.29%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 16.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-640.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -219.24%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
140.74%
AR growth well above ENPH's 114.76%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-438.18%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -295.04%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-116.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -78.23%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-298.32%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -56.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-25.87%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -99.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-171.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -62.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-208.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -171.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-55.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
63.05%
Purchases growth of 63.05% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
122.34%
Liquidation growth of 122.34% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
127.59%
Growth of 127.59% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
50.34%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -171.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -3.28%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-602.35%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.