PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.29%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -83.93%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
34.36%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 7.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-203.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 81.86%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-7.49%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-168.26%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -123.49%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
80.12%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 1731.70%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-62.07%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -1389.47%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-347.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -129.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-74.17%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -124.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-202.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -161.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.61%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 9.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-76.90%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-69.82%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-80.95%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 9.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
7.95%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -536.85%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-225.38%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.