PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -11.79%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.42%
Less D&A growth vs. ENPH's 25.90%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
315.48%
Well above ENPH's 12.87% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-9.36%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 41.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
75.62%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -99.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-20.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -19.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
575.36%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 63.24%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-2123.16%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -54.62%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
116.62%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -114.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
282.25%
Well above ENPH's 15.74%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
67.36%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -26.32%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.91%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ENPH's 25.99%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-82.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-211.05%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 25.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.82%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 75.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
66.05%
Buyback growth of 66.05% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.