PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
42.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 21.77%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-15.57%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 8.86%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-151.38%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-18.44%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 44.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
92.37%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -22.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-146.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -754.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-29.47%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 369.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.22%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -243.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-137.55%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 108.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-183.71%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -6.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
28.86%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -14.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
45.12%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 10.77%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.64%
Purchases growth of 85.64% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
53.06%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 10.77%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
1414.26%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -80.15%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.87%
Buyback growth of 82.87% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.