PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.20%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -34.41%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-11.73%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 1.84%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
4394.55%
Well above ENPH's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-8.03%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -10.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-20.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -97.76%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
153.24%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -28.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-107.15%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 22.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-119.52%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -104.52%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
36.75%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ENPH's 108.56%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-89.45%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -99.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-31.01%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -191.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.88%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 13.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.89%
Growth of 181.89% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
64.47%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 13.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-3049.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 92.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4014.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.