PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1948.82%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.49%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.70%
Less D&A growth vs. ENPH's 2.57%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
Less SBC growth vs. ENPH's 38.64%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
58.14%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -40.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
136.39%
AR growth well above ENPH's 54.64%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-301.92%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -247.31%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
153.71%
AP growth well above ENPH's 120.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-195.30%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 143.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-374.24%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
143.62%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ENPH's 50.61%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
22.75%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 20.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.74%
Growth of 97.74% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
156.27%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 20.50%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-63.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -2.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.27%
Buyback growth of 74.27% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.