PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1011.42%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -121.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.21%
Less D&A growth vs. ENPH's 2.74%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1625.45%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -85.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.00%
Less SBC growth vs. ENPH's 6.28%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-150.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
2643.30%
AR growth well above ENPH's 47.87%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-87.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -68.42%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-114.07%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 134.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
24.24%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -494.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-72.18%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -4.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
53.52%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -43.51%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
45.27%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -58.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
69.34%
Acquisition growth of 69.34% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-540.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
47.56%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -58.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-162.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -37.03%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1837.91%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.