PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-97.29%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 51.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-5.30%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-180.91%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 2109.38%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-10.22%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 23.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-197.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -137.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-189.22%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -620.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-151.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -165.30%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-512.23%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 1114.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
120.79%
Growth well above ENPH's 130.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
58.83%
Some yoy increase while ENPH is negative at -12.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-361.62%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -103.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
9.77%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 0.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-17.57%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-148.76%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6.33%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
3019.57%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -51.39%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.63%
Buyback growth of 78.63% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.