PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1379.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 126.82%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.08%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 5.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
63.39%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -69.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.82%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 1.44%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
45.46%
Less working capital growth vs. ENPH's 328.48%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
32.89%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 85.44%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
1158.73%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 114.65%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-20.76%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -69.46%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.36%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ENPH's 704.36%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-21.86%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -26.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
75.45%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ENPH's 7724.49%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-89.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -154.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
83.03%
Acquisition growth of 83.03% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.44%
Growth of 96.44% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-26.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -154.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-100.08%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 48.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
Buyback growth of 65.63% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.