PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
679.42%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -50.55%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
30.88%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 7.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
542.07%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -99.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.53%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 6.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
16.99%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -39.93%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.75%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 251.88%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
749.51%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -2685.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
136.48%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -19.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-545.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -64.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-341.00%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 249.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
477.41%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -20.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-98.76%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 24.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-11918.40%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-891.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-384.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -21.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
32350.88%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -774.78%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.56%
Buyback growth of 51.56% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.