PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-121.56%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -1672.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-15.17%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 12.28%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-121.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 9450.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.78%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 10.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-69.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -435.22%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
126.87%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -118.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-158.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -115.60%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-213.14%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -41.48%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
100.93%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -62.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
127.29%
Some yoy increase while ENPH is negative at -37.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-192.69%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -229.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
45.69%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 13.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-861.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
68.83%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 46.09%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-374.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2400.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.