PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-271.96%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 203.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
18.83%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 5.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
3657.90%
Well above ENPH's 145.36% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
6.11%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -0.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
63.38%
Well above ENPH's 23.65% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
598.86%
AR growth well above ENPH's 61.70%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-149.08%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -484.83%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-8.83%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -166.51%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-51.34%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 91.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
35.89%
Well above ENPH's 31.46%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
50.99%
Operating cash flow growth similar to ENPH's 48.71%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-12.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -29.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-109.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.80%
Growth of 77.80% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-149.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -29.18%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.60%
Debt repayment growth of 99.60% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.