PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.89%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -2629.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.76%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 6.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
57.01%
Well above ENPH's 42.98% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
10.59%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -5.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-205.01%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 231.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-91.34%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 440.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
10.31%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -53.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
149.26%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -270.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-380.39%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 85.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
38.74%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 254.09%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-185.68%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 234.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-41.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 9.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
611.40%
Acquisition growth of 611.40% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
Growth of 3.62% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
138.19%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 18.76%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-3342.90%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.02%
Buyback growth of 34.02% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.