PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.11%
Net income growth at 75-90% of ENPH's 11.02%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
-2.89%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
245.51%
Well above ENPH's 41.81% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.27%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -9.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
20.77%
Less working capital growth vs. ENPH's 751.49%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-385.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -81.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-430.46%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 231.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
63.23%
Lower AP growth vs. ENPH's 907.90%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
59.72%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -70.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-383.13%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
18.87%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ENPH's 147.60%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-1.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -44.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.83%
Acquisition growth of 97.83% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
21.68%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -44.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
512.16%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -7.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.79%
Buyback growth of 95.79% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.