PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.35%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -12.16%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ENPH at -2.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-28.87%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 310.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.45%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -6.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
35.68%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -158.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
63.00%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -356.36%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
114.36%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -96.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-383.90%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -101.39%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
57.31%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ENPH's 209.17%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
656.85%
Well above ENPH's 60.71%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
57.23%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -383.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-4.10%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 56.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-5521.31%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.25%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 56.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-101.06%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.