PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-426.48%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 29.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
28.98%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -1.96%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-776.53%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-20.81%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -17.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
442.78%
Well above ENPH's 123.48% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
123.34%
AR growth well above ENPH's 88.36%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
120.83%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ENPH's 3580.93%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
90.25%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -2509.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1370.21%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -19.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
297.99%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 2248.89%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
478.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ENPH's 78.81%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-26.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -22.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.92%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-18.08%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 27.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-9328.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.01%
Buyback growth of 56.01% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.