PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
25.35%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -76.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-18.07%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ENPH at -10.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
102.77%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. ENPH's 216.74%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-41.45%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -7.57%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-106.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -448.70%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1568.36%
AR growth well above ENPH's 931.60%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-230.31%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -125.88%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-1531.15%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -255.92%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-73.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -169.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-45.73%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -10.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-126.11%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -461.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
46.04%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -35.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.39%
We have some outflow growth while ENPH is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
44.56%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -129.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
124.99%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -928.17%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-620.21%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.