PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
80.31%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -74.42%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-27.78%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
95.97%
Well above ENPH's 143.04% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-24.11%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 8.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-260.72%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 234.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
139.52%
AR growth well above ENPH's 130.55%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-218.83%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 1191.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-170.14%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -19.22%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-131.53%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -125.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-92.63%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -59.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-587.06%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 275.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
71.22%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -103.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
539.37%
Acquisition growth of 539.37% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.13%
Growth of 23.13% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
90.18%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -103.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-80.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 64.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1136.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.