PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-51.12%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 120.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.76%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 9.51%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-726.54%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
16.21%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -62.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
154.38%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -376.37%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
225.63%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -606.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
331.25%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 489.42%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 116.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
17.14%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ENPH's 101.16%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
3971.78%
Well above ENPH's 10.98%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.73%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -72.49%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-90.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -94.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-240.53%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-237.82%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 21.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-61.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -70.10%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.48%
Buyback growth of 19.48% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.