PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.26%
Net income growth under 50% of ENPH's 289.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.54%
Less D&A growth vs. ENPH's 31.47%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
120.75%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-23.70%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 116.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-205.26%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 194.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-35.53%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 86.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-164.56%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 103.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.76%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -923.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-136.74%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 339.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-466.37%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 810.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
40.73%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 62.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
151.94%
Growth well above ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
57.30%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 91.53%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-40.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -937.36%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1277.94%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.