PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
205.27%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ENPH's 284.01%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-6.85%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 15.40%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.66%
Less SBC growth vs. ENPH's 49.97%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
12.88%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -413.26%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-598.75%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -384.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
51.13%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -316.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
180.11%
AP growth well above ENPH's 146.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
52.74%
Growth well above ENPH's 19.23%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-513.32%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 86.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.61%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -13.43%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.82%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -282.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.64%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
74.10%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -282.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
61.07%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of ENPH's 99.13%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.27%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ENPH's 45.76%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.