PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-117.45%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 192.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-32.11%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ENPH at -6.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-38525.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-20.65%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 17.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.73%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -218.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
104.80%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -133.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-125.59%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -42.31%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
111.69%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -84.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-69.46%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 947.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
73.95%
Some yoy increase while ENPH is negative at -71.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
55.50%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -66.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-52.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -66.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-111.53%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17330.70%
Growth of 17330.70% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
707.59%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -66.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-83.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -37.08%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.77%
We have some buyback growth while ENPH is negative at -219.46%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.