PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
128.32%
Net income growth under 50% of ENPH's 275.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
18.05%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -33.42%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
395.60%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -36604.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
63.76%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 6.93%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-207.91%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 225.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-801.27%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 65.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
55.84%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 82.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
62.45%
AP growth well above ENPH's 91.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-1072.33%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 683.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
42.80%
Well above ENPH's 48.98%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
93.62%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ENPH's 1961.50%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
67.09%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -77.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
328.08%
Acquisition growth of 328.08% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-48.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-64.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -77.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
975.10%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ENPH's 50.37%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -60.14%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94