1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-139.30%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -40.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.46%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 49.69%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-107.64%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 82.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-15.71%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 21.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-1169.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -133.87%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
12.71%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 493.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-112.01%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -40.27%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-216.63%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -722.63%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
105.80%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -170.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-88.20%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -540.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-7700.65%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -61.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
50.39%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 54.81%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
187.66%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 54.81%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-172.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -331.58%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-661.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -811.36%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.