PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
960.52%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -168.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.15%
Less D&A growth vs. ENPH's 7.73%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
495.70%
Well above ENPH's 43.46% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-14.39%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 63.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
135.30%
Well above ENPH's 88.83% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
511.77%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -86.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
184.38%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 233.98%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
63.67%
AP growth well above ENPH's 39.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-890.78%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 103.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-49.71%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 620.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
111.51%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -35.16%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.84%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -32.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -32.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
88.34%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ENPH's 6.27%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.78%
Similar buyback growth to ENPH's 72.61%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.