PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
145.21%
Net income growth at 75-90% of ENPH's 183.23%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
-29.50%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 15.07%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-56.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 171.60%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.77%
Less SBC growth vs. ENPH's 17.07%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-8.46%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 12.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-26.49%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -599.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-114.81%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -285.10%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
251.90%
AP growth well above ENPH's 296.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-120.90%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 614.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-107.79%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -91.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-311.47%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 165.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.82%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 12.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.62%
Growth of 216.62% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-503.99%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 12.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ENPH's 40.89%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.96%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ENPH's 9.13%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.