PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
814.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 85.44%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-78.48%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ENPH at -6.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
2799.84%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -151.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.22%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -42.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-118.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -176.02%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-125.99%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -77.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-228.89%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 33.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-253.18%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 71.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
297.30%
Growth well above ENPH's 14.45%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-165.75%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -1.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
134.63%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.71%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
50.41%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -126.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
112.76%
Acquisition growth of 112.76% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
1927.93%
Liquidation growth of 1927.93% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-112.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
309.96%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -255.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5828.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -90.99%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.