PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
251.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.14%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.18%
Less D&A growth vs. ENPH's 36.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
158.04%
Well above ENPH's 114.82% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
76.81%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 3.15%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
144.69%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -207.10%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
312.93%
AR growth well above ENPH's 16.58%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
222.07%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -141.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
25.15%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -71.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
198.67%
Growth well above ENPH's 2.86%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-309.22%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -74.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
154.55%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -13.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-89.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -65.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
726.30%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 59.60%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-504.26%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 99.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -2077.46%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.