PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -44.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-43.36%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 9.44%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-209.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-50.84%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 206.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-294.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 271.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-109.07%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 112.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-155.30%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -860.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
22.47%
Lower AP growth vs. ENPH's 136.80%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-239.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -13.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
204.59%
Well above ENPH's 1.60%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-207.64%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 72.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
160.04%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 21.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -240.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19379.11%
Growth well above ENPH's 177.78%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
1934.60%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -1372.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
77.12%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -627.42%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.34%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of ENPH's 98.34%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.