PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -52.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.28%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 13.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.81%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 7.34%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
49.14%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -207.61%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
51.86%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -34.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
76.86%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ENPH's 440.18%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
459.92%
AP growth well above ENPH's 297.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-131.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -253.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
86.99%
Well above ENPH's 169.11%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
89.72%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -71.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -81.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -54.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-102.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -1459642.86%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-78.77%
Negative yoy issuance while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.