PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
139.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 63.16%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-46.85%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSLR at -0.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
9.25%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -76.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-188.27%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
69.07%
AR growth well above FSLR's 64.05%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-50.22%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 40.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
283.51%
AP growth of 283.51% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-167.20%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
187.63%
Well above FSLR's 65.83%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-7700.00%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 124.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
13.90%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -39.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -49.48%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
9.56%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -197.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.72%
Negative yoy issuance while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.