PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-531.05%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 783.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.95%
Less D&A growth vs. FSLR's 17.65%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-133.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.35%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -177.01%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-22.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -860.52%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
118.02%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -128.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-9.22%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -905.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
108.20%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -134.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.25%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 2.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-3669.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.35%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -505.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.