PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.17%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 36.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
28.15%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 4.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
2977.78%
Well above FSLR's 30.19% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.84%
Well above FSLR's 51.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2866.31%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -24.58%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.79%
Growth well above FSLR's 47.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-316.68%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -117.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
250.43%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSLR's 23.23%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
47.12%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -48.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-360.19%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSLR stands at 27.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -103.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-21.16%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 139.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-102.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -99.07%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.