PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.79%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 42.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.37%
Less D&A growth vs. FSLR's 31.18%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
86.60%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FSLR's 198.64%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
1.63%
SBC growth of 1.63% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
316.12%
Well above FSLR's 80.76% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.93%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 54.88%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
382.76%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -30.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-184.08%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 144.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
391.18%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSLR's 131.88%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-24.69%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 40.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.16%
Purchases well above FSLR's 18.86%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-68.20%
We reduce yoy sales while FSLR is 39.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-228.35%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-664.33%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 52.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while FSLR is 457.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-92.91%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.