PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.72%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FSLR's 33.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
30.42%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 32.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-101.41%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-110.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 1465.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-741.88%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 113.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-213.78%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 238.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
110.75%
Well above FSLR's 63.06%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-68.96%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 48.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-109.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -34.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-413.81%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSLR stands at 33.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
81.97%
We have some liquidation growth while FSLR is negative at -5.30%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
20.51%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -65.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-74.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -19.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.03%
Buyback growth of 50.03% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.