1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-133.34%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 23.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.91%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 17.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2199.28%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 86.52%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-788.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -325.32%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
386.43%
AR growth of 386.43% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-76.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -524.32%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-118.48%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
103.02%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -103.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
439.84%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -92.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-216.20%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSLR at -68.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
54.87%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 32.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while FSLR is negative at -94.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-16.94%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -64.42%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
77.27%
Growth well above FSLR's 45.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
72.82%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -63.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
766.48%
Debt repayment growth of 766.48% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -25.35%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-184.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.