PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.92%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -284.44%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.62%
Less D&A growth vs. FSLR's 15.25%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
389.61%
Well above FSLR's 62.93% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
12.25%
SBC growth well above FSLR's 5.60%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
174.27%
Well above FSLR's 82.56% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
71.27%
AR growth well above FSLR's 103.96%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-67.00%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 36.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.39%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -1097.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
55.61%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FSLR's 4657.72%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
2691.15%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSLR's 676.94%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
10.33%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -8.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
557.36%
We have some liquidation growth while FSLR is negative at -220.01%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-177.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 1003.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-55.83%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 23.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-104.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -375.50%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.20%
Buyback growth of 23.20% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.