PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-92.54%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 142.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.35%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 12.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
17.83%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -405.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.17%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 51.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
58.39%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 758.56%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
61.56%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. FSLR's 1931.29%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
13.28%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 183.89%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-467.28%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 107.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
72.44%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -103.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
17.58%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 136.30%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
61.76%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -6.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSLR stands at 30.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-2.67%
We reduce yoy sales while FSLR is 720.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
111.02%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -200.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
99.76%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 47.38%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
822.27%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FSLR's 70.62%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while FSLR is negative at -641.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-5.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.